What do you think of this breaking political news?

January 25, 2009 · Print This Article

breaking travel news
suthrngal asked:


McCain WILL attend the debate and then travel back to DC.

Just announced.

travel inc

Comments

29 Responses to “What do you think of this breaking political news?”

  1. ruth on January 27th, 2009 1:18 am

    I’m not surprised, are you? Forfeiting on foreign policy to Obama–egads!

  2. webned on January 30th, 2009 4:34 am

    Big surprise. (yawn)

  3. DAR on February 1st, 2009 8:35 pm

    Thank heavens.

    He was just getting in the way, in DC.

  4. seriously? on February 4th, 2009 9:07 pm

    He had no choice.

  5. garyb1616 on February 6th, 2009 1:43 pm

    Politics is a strange sport……Obama may be nervous cause he was getting more time to practice not saying uhmmm…

    But then Obama can be happy for he does not have to be in the Senate and have a vote in the Bailout……

  6. nirv on February 7th, 2009 7:32 pm

    Drunk monkey

  7. I , a happy Bolshevik on February 10th, 2009 9:29 am

    USA is being ruled by a triumvirate, Bush , Obama and McCain.

  8. dpj5 on February 13th, 2009 8:23 pm

    The reason being is that the dems. would kill any proposal while Mccain is up there because it would make Mccain look good. So, in order to get something done, Mccain is taking the high road and going to the debate.

  9. truth seeker on February 16th, 2009 12:04 am

    that is not breaking news…..

    we all knew that was going to happen.

  10. John McCoward on February 19th, 2009 4:09 am

    McCain blinked.

    McCain is toast.

  11. LeAnne on February 19th, 2009 11:05 am

    You just cause a lot of liberals to choke on their dark, mocha latte with a dash of cinnamon.
    Thanks for the update.

  12. emma-nemma on February 21st, 2009 1:40 pm

    McCain never cancelled the debate, but was wise enough to put it on hold until he did his job in Washington.
    Sure puts egg on the faces of the doubting Thomases who said he was afraid to debate Obama. He again put country first.

  13. caldude1010101 on February 21st, 2009 2:31 pm

    I’m not surprised. McCain could ill afford to allow Obama address 100 million people across the nation for 1.5 hours without any rebuttal.

    Nor could he afford to allow Bob Barr to step in for him either, since that was a potential 2nd option.

  14. Mike on February 25th, 2009 1:25 am

    It really doesn’t matter what McCain does. LIberals will mark his actions as negative. The first responder is this case in point.

  15. Chi Guy on March 1st, 2009 2:17 am

    Once he realized that Americans were not as stupid as he hoped, McCain had no choice but to attend the debate.

  16. libsticker on March 3rd, 2009 7:14 am

    But, But he is scared, he is ducking Obama, he is afraid. Ouch, I guess the democrats will have to find a new doom and gloom talking point for the day. I wonder why McCain didn’t need all the time to practice for the debate that Obama needed. I guess he can multitask after all. Obama now is thinking of phoning the debate in, after all the kids “text” him with the answers.

  17. oimwoomwio on March 5th, 2009 4:50 pm

    I think it’s great.

    I think it shows that the electorate sees his “suspension of his campaign” to have been the craven political ploy that it was, and his team has informed him that he has to get back in the game now.

  18. bullofbama on March 7th, 2009 8:43 am

    McCain has always said he would debate Obama anytime anywhere. He has prodded Obama to do a town hall meeting a week where the people ask the questions rather than the press. Obama is scared to death of this format.

    Any chance their answers are on foreign policy as opposed to the economy? Obama is weak in the polls on foreign affairs but strong on economy. Watch as Obama stammers through his redirecting of the subject.

  19. Phil M on March 8th, 2009 2:48 am

    I think that is the right thing to do for the American people.

    The proposal is “Bush’s Baby” for all intents and purposes. Is this truly an urgent bill that needs to be pushed through, possibly. Is this an urgent bill that needs to be passed and will help Bush if it does, without a doubt.

    This bill, IMHO, is more about political legacy for Bush than it is urgent economic crisis. The stock market has crashed before, it rebounds like it always does.

  20. Chupate esa! on March 8th, 2009 1:34 pm

    He’s full of it and we all know it now.

  21. Lincoln (R)-IL on March 10th, 2009 7:18 pm

    thank god

    he needs to show the american people hes better than barack

  22. DINO on March 12th, 2009 8:44 pm

    It makes McCain look like he is controlling the events in washington a great plow move by McCain and the questions obama and the tax payers hold so dear suddenly become second rate insults to the man who saved america!!!!!

    McCain!!!!!

  23. wordwrangler on March 13th, 2009 2:46 pm

    I like it much better than the Qand A with Obama,had he not shown

  24. Laissez-Faire Guy on March 14th, 2009 12:36 pm

    The deal seems to be going through. He’s done what he needed to and can now go back to campaigning.

  25. Yemaya on March 15th, 2009 3:03 am

    What I think is Mc Cain is a such drama queen or to put it less nice a whining beotch – nothing good will come out of this dramatic play so keep reaching for “Hope” maybe the repubs can steal that from Obama too since they ain’t got nothing else to go on…hahahaha the conservatives are doing it to themselves…..and I am enjoying the show

  26. im_foxygirl on March 18th, 2009 4:20 am

    He had no choice. He looked like a fool.

  27. cbrown122 on March 21st, 2009 4:08 am

    I will give the unpopular answer.

    He bowed to pressure, there is no way he should have shown up to the debate.

    We all know Obama is the better speaker and given the liberel bend of the media, why go through with tonight’s debate? He gains nothing from it. He can have the better ideas, but he won’t “win.”

    During the 2004 election season….
    “An academic content analysis of election news later found that coverage at ABC, CBS, and NBC was more favorable toward Kerry than Bush, while coverage at Fox News Channel was more favorable toward Bush.”

    There is absolutely no reason to believe anything has changed, except possibly at MSNBC…slightly.

    On a personal note, I am glad the debate is happening but I think it just set a horrible

    The Democrats cancelled an April 27 Presidential Debate because of “time constraints” but we can’t cancel a debate because of an economic crisis that should be the main attention of the two Presidential hopefuls?

    Let’s look back to 1980 when popular to media belief, a debate was cancelled. The first debate Carter did not attend because Anderson was there. The second debate was CANCELED. The third debate, Reagan gave in and Anderson was not present (Reagan insisted on all three candidates being at the debates).

    To further show how messed up our country is. An economic crisis can NOT cancel a debate, but a union strike can.

    Last Dec 10, all three major Democrat candidates refused to cross a strike line to have a debate. WAY TO GO Sen. Obama. Let a stupid strike cancel a debate but NOT an economic crisis. Umm…what happened to doing TWO things at once?

  28. Nikki on March 23rd, 2009 3:35 am

    I bought popcorn & a six pack…oh & I have to put a tape in the VCR (yeah I know. No DVD. Still stuck in 8-track mode)

  29. Snowboard Zombie on March 23rd, 2009 5:09 pm

    I think…you’re still sexy.

    I like it when you talk dirty.

Got something to say?