I like it when you talk dirty.

He bowed to pressure, there is no way he should have shown up to the debate.

We all know Obama is the better speaker and given the liberel bend of the media, why go through with tonight’s debate? He gains nothing from it. He can have the better ideas, but he won’t “win.”

During the 2004 election season….
“An academic content analysis of election news later found that coverage at ABC, CBS, and NBC was more favorable toward Kerry than Bush, while coverage at Fox News Channel was more favorable toward Bush.”

There is absolutely no reason to believe anything has changed, except possibly at MSNBC…slightly.

On a personal note, I am glad the debate is happening but I think it just set a horrible

The Democrats cancelled an April 27 Presidential Debate because of “time constraints” but we can’t cancel a debate because of an economic crisis that should be the main attention of the two Presidential hopefuls?

Let’s look back to 1980 when popular to media belief, a debate was cancelled. The first debate Carter did not attend because Anderson was there. The second debate was CANCELED. The third debate, Reagan gave in and Anderson was not present (Reagan insisted on all three candidates being at the debates).

To further show how messed up our country is. An economic crisis can NOT cancel a debate, but a union strike can.

Last Dec 10, all three major Democrat candidates refused to cross a strike line to have a debate. WAY TO GO Sen. Obama. Let a stupid strike cancel a debate but NOT an economic crisis. Umm…what happened to doing TWO things at once?

Although, wouldn’t that mean possibly leaving the twins alone all night in a large Portuguese Villa with a pool ????